Instead of a device that looks like this:Īnd admit it, even with static “tiles,” that latter design does look better. So consumers will get this misguided piece of junk: The thing is, if Apple had used square icons, it could have resulted in something that looked just like Windows Phone, but without the benefits of the Windows Phone UI’s tiles, which include live updates and dynamic information. Physicochemical characteristics of kimchi powder manufactured by hot air drying and. They agreed not to copy Microsoft’s mobile products. So Apple agreed not to copy Microsoft too. As part of a cross-licensing of mobile patents, both companies agreed not to copy each other.

And you’re thinking that because that’s how the mainstream media reported this situation. You’re thinking that Microsoft agreed to not copy Apple, not the other way around. More specifically, by not copying the design of Windows Phone, which feature large, finger-friendly (and more expressive) live tiles, Apple has instead been forced to compromise on the design of the iPod nano. It’s because Apple promised not to copy Microsoft’s products. But I have a (humorous) theory about why the iPod nano is so horrible. Even Apple’s most fanatical followers are sheepishly admitting that the UI of the firm’s latest iPod nano is laughably terrible, with bizarre, round icons that bear no resemblance at all to Apple’s normally beautiful products.

Solid state drive for macbook air 2012